Khuy (хуй; хуй (help·info)), often written in Latin as « hui » or even « hooy » by Russian schoolchildren/beginners in English classes, means tail, penis or for a corresponding familiar register: tail. The etymology of the term is unclear. Dominant theories include Proto-Indo-European (PIE) *ks-u-, related to хвоя (khvoya, « pine needles »), attributed to Pederson, 1908; [10] [11] of PIE *hau-, related to хвост (khvost, « tail »), attributed to Merlingen, 1955; From Mongolian хуй (khui, meaning « sheath » or « sheath »). This was the etymology supported by the Soviet government and attributed to Maxim Gorky, who claimed that it was a loanword imposed during the Mongol yoke. Alexander Gorokhovsky suggests the derivation of the Latin huic (lit. « for », used on recipes for genital diseases) as a euphemism, because the Old Russian « ud/uda » (from the root PIE *ud- means « high, out ») was taboo in the mid-18th century. [12] Another theory is that it comes from the Greek word huios, meaning son. [ref. needed] Currently, the first volume of the Great Mat Dictionary of the Russian linguist and folklorist Alexei Plutser-Sarno deals only with expressions with the root хуй (khuy) and has more than 500 entries; 12 volumes are planned. The word khuy also appears in various other Slavic languages with the same meaning and pronunciation, but not always the same spelling, as the Polish chuj.
Some in the legal world took offense at Scalia`s interpretation. Bruce Huber, a professor of energy and environmental law at Notre Dame Law School, said he found the conservative judiciary`s opinion questionable. Other legal experts have found concerns about the legality of the Clean Power Plan in the MATS decision itself. Scalia sided with the complainants, noting that the EPA misinterpreted the Clean Air Act when it failed to consider costs when deciding that the regulations were appropriate and necessary. However, the fact that he did not go further led many legal experts to conclude that the verdict was not as bad for the EPA or the Obama administration as it could have been. In 2014, Roskomnadzor compiled a list of four lexical roots, according to which all words derived from these roots – nouns, adjectives, verbs, participles, etc. – of the Russian language are « absolutely unacceptable in the mass media » for Russia: khuy (« rooster »); pizda (« cunt »); yebat (« whore »); and Blyad (« whore »). Since Roskomnadzor is the government agency legally empowered to make such decisions, this is precisely the currently active Russian legal definition of « matte ».
[2] In the hours and days following the decision, there was speculation throughout the U.S. energy industry about what the decision would mean. Should the agency rewrite MATS? Does the decision mean problems for the Clean Power Plan? What does all this mean for utilities? Utility Dive spoke with legal experts to find out. before the 12th century, in the sense defined as 1a(1) « Here`s what someone at the EPA told me, » Dunn said. « This is a case where all the legal arguments against this rule have been laid out from day one. There are no hidden arguments from gotcha. With the plan not expected to be released until August, a Supreme Court challenge could still take years. At this point, many of the legal issues may have been largely contentious. As the proposed rule is drafted today, states and utilities are expected to begin complying with carbon regulations as early as 2020. This could mean that by the time a challenge reaches the Supreme Court, all utilities will have to aggressively reduce their carbon emissions. And even if it doesn`t, some of the nation`s most powerful utilities expect the EPA to be well prepared for the challenge. Since July 1, 2014, Mat has been banned from all films, theatrical productions and concerts in Russia. [3] In modern Russia, the use of carpets in the media is censored and the use of carpets in public constitutes petty hooliganism, a form of misconduct punishable under Article 20.1.1 of the Criminal Code of Russia,[21] although there is no clear legal definition of what exactly « carpet » is.
[22] Despite the public ban, the carpet is used by Russians of all ages and from almost all social groups, with particular zeal in the male-dominated military and structurally similar social classes. [23] It would not be surprising, Huber said, if the Court took a similar approach to the Clean Power Plan, given that it is such an important regulatory package and raises serious legal questions about its implementation. In particular, critics question whether the EPA can regulate « beyond the fence » of power plants, essentially forcing states and utilities to switch to a low-carbon generation mix, rather than simply regulating the plants themselves. Since Monday`s MATS decision, legal experts and the media have been scouring Scalia`s opinion for clues on how the court might interpret the Clean Power Plan. In the hours following the decision, some media outlets pointed to a glimmer of hope for the Obama administration because the MATS decision undermines a key argument of those questioning the Clean Power Plan — that the Clean Air Act prevents the EPA from regulating carbon emissions from power plants because it has already regulated those emissions under the MATS rule.
