After the defeat in the previous lawsuit, Axel Springer filed a new lawsuit in 2019 for new reasons. This time, the publisher claimed that AdBlock Plus « changed the programming code of the websites and therefore directly accessed the publishers` legally protected offers. » In other words, AdBlock Plus infringes copyright. There`s a good exploration of how to implement a UGC that deals with adblocking: I don`t think this specific judgment applies to games. Music and graphics in games can (and probably are) copyrighted elements, regardless of the game as a whole, so the release itself is copyrighted here. There may still be ways to stream your games legally, but they don`t. To fund their operations, millions of websites rely on advertising to generate revenue. However, for some readers, excessive or intrusive advertising needs to be combated, often through the use of ad-blocking tools. Even YouTube shows ads before the main video. It is impossible to avoid all advertisements, all the time. The court understood this well, but it is the German publishers who push bad laws such as filtering all content, images, texts, videos, although there is no way to check all the content, is it legal, is it fair use, it is hurtful, it is impossible to get a list of new content images videos music created every day Who owns this, who is the songwriter, etc. Most newspapers simply have a paywall, read a few articles for free before you are offered a subscription, people can use apps or just use non-German websites if the law is too strict if we were to start with the person who does not make the income they could make, as opposed to how it happened. logically, all these examples should also be made illegal. Since hey, the hypothetical owner of the store, the owner of the website has not earned the money he could have.
and, OMI, to call these situations morally reprehensible would be ridiculous at best. On Android, apps can run a local VPN connection with their own host filtering feature and DNS address without requiring root access. [63] This approach allows the ad-blocker app to download host files to block ads and use them to filter ad networks on the device. AdGuard, Blokada[64], DNS66,[65] and RethinkDNS[66][67] are just some of the most popular applications that perform ad blockers without root privileges. Ad blocking is only active when the local VPN is enabled and stops completely when the VPN connection is disconnected. Convenience makes it easy to access content that has been blocked by anti-adblock scripts. In addition, the « Terms of Use » of a website may refer to adblocking. As we all know, the terms of use of the website are not always legally binding on the website visitor. But sometimes they are. Because there is no law that says you have to look at the ads. It`s legal for the same reason that it`s legal for you to switch channels on the TV (or quickly advance the DVR) when ads start, or skip ads when you`re reading a magazine.
It is now illegal to throw away cups received in the mail. If you read the newspaper, it is now illegal for you not to read the ads. And yet, it`s somehow illegal to bypass a paywall if the information is in plain text in HTML or cached by Google. What would have happened is that companies that make ad-blocking extensions would have reported them with a note stating that it is illegal to use this software in Germany, which German citizens would have quickly ignored. Even if they hadn`t made the software available for download in Germany, we all know how well it works, between VPNs and proxies and people carrying USB drives across borders. These extensions would have become the « forbidden fruit » that everyone wanted. The company behind the popular Adblock Plus service won a major legal victory in Germany, as the country`s Supreme Court ruled that it was not violating competition law by charging publishers for inclusion in its whitelist. Publishers have once again failed in their attempts to block ads that have been made illegal. The best part of companies that panic about ad blockers like this is that it`s a completely self-inflicted wound, if those who push and host ads had thought they were reasonable, discreet and not as a malware vector, people wouldn`t have been so eager to block them all, but since they didn`t do anything about it, others had to intervene and react in the same way.
blockadblock.com/adblocking/addressing-adblocking-terms-use-agreement/ It has been suggested that in the European Union, the practice of scanning websites for ad-blocking software could violate the ePrivacy Directive. [86] This claim was confirmed by the IAB Europe guidelines published in June 2016, which state that there may indeed be a legal issue in detecting ad blockers. [87] Although some anti-blocking stakeholders have attempted to refute this,[88][89] it can be assumed that publishers should follow the guidelines of the main IAB publishing lobby. The joint effort announced by IAB Sweden prior to IAB Europe`s directive on this subject never materialised and would most likely have been in breach of EU competition law if it had been. [Citation needed] [Original research?] Eyeo immediately dismissed the allegations as « almost absurd, » noting that its browser-side tool wasn`t trying to change anything on Springer`s servers. Nevertheless, Springer continued his lawsuit, claiming that by interfering with the provision of the website to viewers, it constituted copyright infringement and deserved an injunction. This is a complicated question, as ad blockers have become increasingly complex in recent years. What it means to « block » ads from a legal and technical point of view is more complex than it was a few years ago. blockadblock.com/adblocking/adblockers-ne-pas-enfreindre-la-loi-sauf-quand-ils-le-font/ I`ve seen the term « acceptable ads » that Adblock lets through unless you go to settings and turn it off.
But some publishers still don`t understand it. One of the worst is German media giant Axel Springer, who has been one of the most vocal supporters of the European Copyright Directive and owns tons of publications around the world, including Politico and Business Insider in the United States. As obnoxious as some publishers are on the Internet, Axel Springer was worse. Years ago, Axel Springer sued the company behind Adblock Plus and lost. The courts have concluded that ad blocking is completely legal. Yes, it is perfectly legal to block ads. While websites specifically organize what they show or promote to consumers, it`s up to user behavior to determine how they want to consume that content.
